Response says
Wholly disagrees and says no particular withheld contract information is identified.
What should residents consider about Finding F5: When the general manager is negotiating contracts, such as those for the easements and the contract with the City of Hollister, the Board is not receiving all of the pertinent details., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Wholly disagrees and says no particular withheld contract information is identified.
Audit analysis
The response narrows its rebuttal to legally required information and requests specificity. It does not identify contract packets or reconcile all pertinent details with the report’s examples; statutory-position adequacy is not demonstrated factual completeness.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
2/6
Public usefulness
The response narrows its rebuttal to legally required information and requests specificity. It does not identify contract packets or reconcile all pertinent details with the report’s examples; statutory-position adequacy is not demonstrated factual completeness.
Scoring confidence: medium
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.