Response says
The district disagrees and describes the SELPA plan as a snapshot of services at drafting.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F7
The 2025-26 SELPA plan does not accurately reflect the provision of transition services to students, which could give the impression the SELPA is doing nothing
What should residents consider about Finding F7: The 2025-26 SELPA plan does not accurately reflect the provision of transition services to students, which could give the impression the SELPA is doing nothing, and the County’s response?
Natomas Unified School District Board of EducationAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The timing explanation engages the disputed representation but does not supply the underlying plan or reconcile missing service codes.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
4/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
The timing explanation engages the disputed representation but does not supply the underlying plan or reconcile missing service codes.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...