Response says
The district disagrees, stating that case managers appear at every level of its discipline matrix.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F5
The Grand Jury finds the District’s discipline matrix may delay notification to case managers of a student’s behavioral issue until the student is facing possible suspension, resulting in some special education students unnecessarily missing school
What should residents consider about Finding F5: The Grand Jury finds the District’s discipline matrix may delay notification to case managers of a student’s behavioral issue until the student is facing possible suspension, resulting in some special education students unnecessarily missing school, and the County’s response?
Natomas Unified School District Board of EducationAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response identifies the relevant matrix provisions and pre-suspension involvement, directly addressing the disputed timing. The matrix is a traceable named record but is not appended.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The response identifies the relevant matrix provisions and pre-suspension involvement, directly addressing the disputed timing. The matrix is a traceable named record but is not appended.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...