Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2

The City Council’s failure to provide the Commission with an effective process for considering its recommendations limits the ability of SPD, the Council, and the community to evaluate the Commission's recommendations (R2)

What should residents consider about Finding F2: The City Council’s failure to provide the Commission with an effective process for considering its recommendations limits the ability of SPD, the Council, and the community to evaluate the Commission's recommendations (R2), and the County’s response?

City of SacramentoResponse dated 2026-09-08Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

The City disagrees and cites Chapter 17 procedures through the Personnel and Public Employees Committee.

Audit analysis

The response explains annual reports, workplans and other recommendation routes with specific procedural authority; effectiveness remains disputed rather than independently demonstrated.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The response explains annual reports, workplans and other recommendation routes with specific procedural authority; effectiveness remains disputed rather than independently demonstrated.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is