Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F5

The County’s FY2015 amortization payment to CalPERS was $9,508,354.

What should residents consider about Finding F5: The County’s FY2015 amortization payment to CalPERS was $9,508,354., and the County’s response?

Nevada County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Disagrees; gives $7,391,504 for Miscellaneous and explains that Safety costs were bundled.

Audit analysis

The response identifies the disputed payment and why a separate Safety amortization amount is not used. The actuarial-report basis is identified; the Safety explanation continues on page 3.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The response identifies the disputed payment and why a separate Safety amortization amount is not used. The actuarial-report basis is identified; the Safety explanation continues on page 3.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is