Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3

The County has followed CalPERS’s amortization plan over the past decade.

What should residents consider about Finding F3: The County has followed CalPERS’s amortization plan over the past decade., and the County’s response?

Nevada County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Agrees and explains CalPERS’s annual point-in-time amortization method.

Audit analysis

Agreement is explicit. The response explains the twenty-year schedule and identifies CalPERS’s annual amortization plan as its basis.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Agreement is explicit. The response explains the twenty-year schedule and identifies CalPERS’s annual amortization plan as its basis.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is