Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F23

Given the County’s UPL position at the end of FY2024, if the County then began to pay an additional $5,000,000 each year, elimination of the 2024 UPL would occur in 2037 rather than 2044. 18 If the County adds personnel or increases salaries, the County should increase the annual additional payments commensurately.

What should residents consider about Finding F23: Given the County’s UPL position at the end of FY2024, if the County then began to pay an additional $5,000,000 each year, elimination of the 2024 UPL would occur in 2037 rather than 2044. 18 If the County adds personnel or increases salaries, the County should increase the annual additional payments commensurately., and the County’s response?

Nevada County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Disagrees with certainty about eliminating total liability by 2037, while accepting the static June 2024 calculation.

Audit analysis

The response explains new amortization bases and annual valuation changes. It concedes the finding’s fixed-2024 projection but challenges broader future-total certainty; the disputed scope is therefore materially incomplete for the finding as actually framed.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The response explains new amortization bases and annual valuation changes. It concedes the finding’s fixed-2024 projection but challenges broader future-total certainty; the disputed scope is therefore materially incomplete for the finding as actually framed.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is