Response says
Disagrees; describes consultant work, an October 2025 policy revision and a plan scheduled for May 12, 2026.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F18
At the end of the year, the County had developed no plan.
What should residents consider about Finding F18: At the end of the year, the County had developed no plan., and the County’s response?
Nevada County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Dated steps are traceable, but the paragraph describes developing and forthcoming work rather than clearly identifying a completed plan by the disputed year-end deadline.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Dated steps are traceable, but the paragraph describes developing and forthcoming work rather than clearly identifying a completed plan by the disputed year-end deadline.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...