Response says
Disagrees; identifies at least 27 Board occasions discussing pension liabilities.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F15
There is no record of the Board of Supervisors ever having discussed the unfunded-pension-liability problem for the past 10 years other than the Board’s responses to earlier GJ reports.
What should residents consider about Finding F15: There is no record of the Board of Supervisors ever having discussed the unfunded-pension-liability problem for the past 10 years other than the Board’s responses to earlier GJ reports., and the County’s response?
Nevada County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response explicitly disputes the claimed absence of discussion and introduces a dated meeting-record list on pages 6–8 with legislative identifiers. That is traceable support, not a hub finding that all cited meetings establish an effective plan.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The response explicitly disputes the claimed absence of discussion and introduces a dated meeting-record list on pages 6–8 with legislative identifiers. That is traceable support, not a hub finding that all cited meetings establish an effective plan.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...