Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1.7

F1.7: Recent positive change at LASD appears to have been primarily the result of external pressure, e.g., settlements, oversight, publicity, as opposed to internal evolution in organizational culture, which tends to change in concert with changes in personnel and leadership.

What should residents consider about Finding F1.7: F1.7: Recent positive change at LASD appears to have been primarily the result of external pressure, e.g., settlements, oversight, publicity, as opposed to internal evolution in organizational culture, which tends to change in concert with changes in personnel and leadership., and the County’s response?

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)Response dated 2026-09-01Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Acknowledges external influence but points to internal leadership and the Office of Constitutional Policing as additional sources of change.

Audit analysis

The response distinguishes external and internal drivers and identifies a concrete organizational change. This is checkable institutional support, not independent proof of cultural outcomes. Report physical PDF page(s) 84; County response physical PDF page(s) 7. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The response distinguishes external and internal drivers and identifies a concrete organizational change. This is checkable institutional support, not independent proof of cultural outcomes.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is