Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1.2

F1.2: The Virtual Deputy Program, currently in use, has shown to be an advantage in response time over in-person response to calls.

What should residents consider about Finding F1.2: F1.2: The Virtual Deputy Program, currently in use, has shown to be an advantage in response time over in-person response to calls., and the County’s response?

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)Response dated 2026-09-01Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Explicit agreement only; response-time and staffing benefits are not elaborated or documented.

Audit analysis

Explicit agreement supplies a position and requires no disagreement explanation. The bare agreement adds no substantive discussion of the finding, concrete reasoning or checkable support. Report physical PDF page(s) 83; County response physical PDF page(s) 5. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

4/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

0/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
0/2
Reason specificity
0/2
Support traceability
0/2

Explicit agreement supplies a position and requires no disagreement explanation. The bare agreement adds no substantive discussion of the finding, concrete reasoning or checkable support.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is