Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3.2

F3.2: The examination/autopsy facilities of the LACO Medical Examiner are inadequate compared to those of other counties and located in an outdated 1974 building.

What should residents consider about Finding F3.2: F3.2: The examination/autopsy facilities of the LACO Medical Examiner are inadequate compared to those of other counties and located in an outdated 1974 building., and the County’s response?

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)Response dated 2026-09-01Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

County partially disagrees, citing added forensic technicians and a pathologist assistant expected to start that summer. It does not resolve the finding's aged-facility, processing-delay, or staff-stress propositions.

Audit analysis

Position is explicit, but disputed scope is materially incomplete across the compound finding. Specific support-staff duties explain proposed caseload relief; staffing assertions have no identified underlying record. Report physical PDF page(s) 170; County response physical PDF page(s) 39. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

7/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

4/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

Position is explicit, but disputed scope is materially incomplete across the compound finding. Specific support-staff duties explain proposed caseload relief; staffing assertions have no identified underlying record.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is