Response says
County expressly gives no substantive response to the LAPD interagency-camera-access finding because it concerns City of Los Angeles operations.
What should residents consider about Finding F9.5: F9.5: LAPD cannot easily access cameras and systems operated by some other public agencies, such as the cameras of the Los Angeles Department of Water & Power and the Bureau of Steet Services., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
County expressly gives no substantive response to the LAPD interagency-camera-access finding because it concerns City of Los Angeles operations.
Audit analysis
No discernible agreement or disagreement with the finding. County clearly bounds its response and explains the jurisdictional exclusion with a specific municipal attribution, without citing authority. Not evidence of City nonresponse. Report physical PDF page(s) 385; County response physical PDF page(s) 54. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
0/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
No discernible agreement or disagreement with the finding. County clearly bounds its response and explains the jurisdictional exclusion with a specific municipal attribution, without citing authority. Not evidence of City nonresponse.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.