Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F9.1

F9.1: LASD’s Civilian Oversight Commission generally focuses on incarceration and officer use-of-force issues but does not regularly review and report on LASD’s use of technologies at every meeting.

What should residents consider about Finding F9.1: F9.1: LASD’s Civilian Oversight Commission generally focuses on incarceration and officer use-of-force issues but does not regularly review and report on LASD’s use of technologies at every meeting., and the County’s response?

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (consolidated County departmental response)Response dated 2026-09-01Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

County partially disagrees, citing an existing COC technology ad hoc committee and LASD's institutional separation; it does not address review and reporting at every meeting.

Audit analysis

Position is explicit, but committee existence does not fully explain disagreement with the meeting-frequency proposition or stated emphasis on incarceration and force. Committee and institutional claims are specific assertions without an identified supporting record on this page. Report physical PDF page(s) 384; County response physical PDF page(s) 53. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

6/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

3/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
1/2
Support traceability
1/2

Position is explicit, but committee existence does not fully explain disagreement with the meeting-frequency proposition or stated emphasis on incarceration and force. Committee and institutional claims are specific assertions without an identified supporting record on this page.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is