Response says
County partially disagrees, describing DMH merit-based recruitment, cultural-needs documentation and training. Response does not resolve demographic disproportions or comprehensively address DCFS workers and resource families.
What should residents consider about Finding F2.7: F2.7: Racial disparity poses a challenge, especially with Black and Hispanic children., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
County partially disagrees, describing DMH merit-based recruitment, cultural-needs documentation and training. Response does not resolve demographic disproportions or comprehensively address DCFS workers and resource families.
Audit analysis
Partial disagreement is explicit, but disputed portions of compound finding are not clearly mapped. DMH-specific reasons are concrete and cite Civil Service Rules, CLAS standards and Medi-Cal requirements; demographic and non-DMH propositions remain unexplained. Report physical PDF page(s) 133; County response physical PDF page(s) 19. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
Partial disagreement is explicit, but disputed portions of compound finding are not clearly mapped. DMH-specific reasons are concrete and cite Civil Service Rules, CLAS standards and Medi-Cal requirements; demographic and non-DMH propositions remain unexplained.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.