Response says
County agrees with the finding about split evacuation-order responsibilities and uncoordinated response during the 2025 fires, expressly for County operations only.
What should residents consider about Finding F5.6: F5.6: During the 2025 fires, the responsibility to issue evacuation orders was split among several agencies, including the City EMD and the County OEM, resulting in an uncoordinated emergency response., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
County agrees with the finding about split evacuation-order responsibilities and uncoordinated response during the 2025 fires, expressly for County operations only.
Audit analysis
Explicit County-scoped agreement requires no disagreement explanation; no added reasoning or supporting basis is supplied. Report physical PDF page(s) 232; County response physical PDF page(s) 45. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
2/6
Public usefulness
Explicit County-scoped agreement requires no disagreement explanation; no added reasoning or supporting basis is supplied.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.