Response says
County disagrees for County operations, predicting federal Olympic-preparation funds distributed through the State and access to one-time safety/security funding, with Sheriff and Fire coordination roles.
What should residents consider about Finding F5.4: F5.4: The City EMD and County OEM do not have sufficient funding to prepare for major events such as the 2028 Olympic Games, resulting in inadequate emergency preparedness., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
County disagrees for County operations, predicting federal Olympic-preparation funds distributed through the State and access to one-time safety/security funding, with Sheriff and Fire coordination roles.
Audit analysis
Whole disagreement and County scope are explicit; anticipated funding explains the position on preparedness. No amounts, allocations, award records, or preparedness measures substantiate sufficiency, so reasoning remains general and support consists of assertions. Report physical PDF page(s) 231; County response physical PDF page(s) 45. Claims remain attributed; adoption date is not a filing or receipt date.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
4/6
Public usefulness
Whole disagreement and County scope are explicit; anticipated funding explains the position on preparedness. No amounts, allocations, award records, or preparedness measures substantiate sufficiency, so reasoning remains general and support consists of assertions.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.