Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BOARD-F7

When held, scenario-based disaster response training typically focuses on agency coordination, mitigation, and planning, but often does not include the actual activities that need to be performed during a real event. As a result, law enforcement officers may not be adequately trained on the specific skills needed to respond to disasters in their communities. (R4, R5, R6, R7, R8)

What should residents consider about Finding BOARD-F7: When held, scenario-based disaster response training typically focuses on agency coordination, mitigation, and planning, but often does not include the actual activities that need to be performed during a real event. As a result, law enforcement officers may not be adequately trained on the specific skills needed to respond to disasters in their communities. (R4, R5, R6, R7, R8), and the County’s response?

Humboldt County SheriffResponse dated 2026-07-27Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Partly agrees; some exercises include practical response activities.

Audit analysis

The Board accepts the importance of realistic instruction and distinguishes planning-only work from hands-on components in the F6 exercises. This identifies its disputed portion without independently verifying training adequacy.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

The Board accepts the importance of realistic instruction and distinguishes planning-only work from hands-on components in the F6 exercises. This identifies its disputed portion without independently verifying training adequacy.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is