The jury recommends a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis. Discussion can consider cost, recruitment feasibility and service quality as proposed comparison criteria, not findings that one model is necessarily cheaper.
Why this matters
Clear comparisons help residents understand specialized service spending and trade-offs.
Public participation
Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.
Supporting evidence
This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.
Supporting report