Supporting report
Civil Grand Jury Website: Bringing Clarity to the Public Process
- Report section
- Recommendation R1
- Source citation
- Civil Grand Jury Website: Bringing Clarity to the Public Process, Recommendation R1, PDF page 8.
← All civic questionsParticipate in this conversation
Understanding and Joining the Grand Jury
How should the jury, Court, and County IT divide responsibility for recurring review of public grand jury information?
R1 recommends annual consultation among IT, the sitting jury, and the Court to maintain current website information. The question considers review responsibilities rather than presuming that a service agreement alone meets the recommendation.
Why this matters
Defined review ownership helps public information remain useful across annual jury turnover.
Public participation
Participate in this conversation
Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Supporting evidence
Evidence from the report
This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.