Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← All civic questions
Following Promises Across Jury Terms

How should public follow-up distinguish completed actions, ongoing work, and promises left to later jury terms?

The continuity report explains that juries review earlier responses selecting future implementation or further analysis. Its historical recommendations are context, not newly issued obligations in this cycle.

Why this matters

A clear distinction between responses and outcomes can make oversight easier to follow despite annual turnover.

Participate in this conversation

Public participation

Participate in this conversation

Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is

Supporting evidence

Evidence from the report

This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.

Supporting report

Continuity and Response Compliance

Report section
Continuity: Report Responses Requiring Follow-up
Source citation
Continuity and Response Compliance, Continuity: Report Responses Requiring Follow-up, PDF page 5.
View referenced source