Response says
The District agrees that audits were not current and explains its transition in leadership and financial administration.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1
Past-due independent audits
What should residents consider about Finding F1: Past-due independent audits, and the County’s response?
Altaville-Melones Fire Protection DistrictResponse dated 2026-08-02Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response identifies specific governance changes, an auditor, and Government Code section 26909. Its acceptance and explanation address the finding with a checkable basis.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The response identifies specific governance changes, an auditor, and Government Code section 26909. Its acceptance and explanation address the finding with a checkable basis.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...