Response says
The County partially disagrees, recognizing evaluations as a channel for communication while disputing the relationship to staff cohesion.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3
Performance evaluations and communication
What should residents consider about Finding F3: Performance evaluations and communication, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Board of SupervisorsResponse dated 2026-08-11Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response does not clearly resolve whether evaluations were conducted regularly or explain the disputed effect on cohesion. It supplies general reasoning without a checkable evaluation record.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
2/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 0/2
The response does not clearly resolve whether evaluations were conducted regularly or explain the disputed effect on cohesion. It supplies general reasoning without a checkable evaluation record.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...