Response says
The county explicitly agrees that limited proactive grant seeking may have missed funding opportunities.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
Staff time for road grants
What should residents consider about Finding F2: Staff time for road grants, and the County’s response?
Amador County Board of Supervisors, County Administrative Officer, and Public Works DirectorResponse dated 2025-10-07Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The item expressly agrees with the complete finding. No disagreement explanation is required. It provides no additional rationale or supporting record.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
2/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 0/2
- Support traceability
- 0/2
The item expressly agrees with the complete finding. No disagreement explanation is required. It provides no additional rationale or supporting record.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...